| 156122744845_522160007459 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
Hi Russell
Thanks for your reply,
Pls find the code attached
regards..
Prafulla . .
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell King - ARM Linux [ rel="nofollow" mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mail |
|
|   |
| 124521944064_598160007566 | Prafulla WADASKAR |
|
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:50:10 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 09:27:23AM +0530, Prafulla WADASKAR wrote:
input_unregister_device(kp- inp_dev);
/* if this |
|
|   |
| 194325724925_500560007463 | Guennadi Liakhovetsk |
|
Hi Russell
thanks for your inputs and reviews
the kernel page fault problem on re-insertion a module is solved by removing
input_free_device after unregister.
Now I am facing anther problem,
when I |
|
|   |
| 195426344004_505860007655 | Robbie |
|
Hi all,
I am using omap5912 board. I want to map the SDRAM to DSP. How to do this
in linux.
Thanks in advance
regards
Prabha J.
Tata Consultancy Services Limited
Mailto: prabha.j@xxxxxxx
Website: |
|
|   |
| 181323794114_579260007577 | James Steward |
|
|
|
|   |
| 110323884852_594860007861 | Bart Jonkers |
|
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 09:33 -0500, Robbie wrote:
The three threads are essentially three loops performing various tasks. For all Im read I havent seen where in a RR policy a process must block or |
|
|   |
| 140728544055_547260007274 | Bart Jonkers |
|
|
|
|   |
| 103727774846_596360007925 | MarcAndrxE9 HxE9bert |
|
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 10:51:50AM +0200, Bart Jonkers wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:02 -0800, tmike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Quoting Bart Jonkers <jonkersbart@xxxxxxxxx :
Have you loo |
|
|   |
| 142627364559_543160007494 | MarcAndrxE9 HxE9bert |
|
|
|
|   |
| 108626084874_520060007701 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:25:43AM -0500, Marc-Andr? H?bert wrote:
-----Message dorigine-----
De : Andy Gatward [ rel="nofollow" mailto:agatward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:agatward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
|   |
| 177825034088_562960007697 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 01:05:58PM -0500, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
Just tried that and its pumping a series of these, heres the first one I
get (I can send the next ones if it helps):
Id assume |
|
|   |
| 149028584550_554560007384 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
De : Russell King - ARM Linux [ rel="nofollow" mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ]
Looks like userspace has jumped |
|
|   |
| 182023684161_566560007945 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ]
000b4a70 <__libc_malloc :
b4a70: e92d407 |
|
|   |
| 159027574680_514960007475 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ]
You could try adding cachepolicy=writethrough to your kernel c |
|
|   |
| 164422734082_551760007482 | MarcAndre Hebert |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ]
This means you are running your test program from either an ID |
|
|   |
| 121822514985_530660007435 | Nicolas Pitre |
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
I know the ext2 fs doesnt make much sense for us, it was kept like that
mostly because that how it was.
Your truly knows that JFFS didnt exist at t |
|
|   |
| 100323714293_555360007623 | Pavel Pisa |
|
-----Message dorigine-----
De : Nicolas Pitre [ rel="nofollow" mailto:nico@xxxxxxx mailto:nico@xxxxxxx ]
Envoye : 23 mars 2006 23:09
A : Marc-Andre Hebert
Cc : Russell King - ARM Linux; |
|
|   |
| 193827364991_509960007321 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Pavel Pisa wrote:
does that mean, that this patch is required for all platforms, where
the MTD reads are used on non coherent cache systems (ARM)? If so, is it
expected to |
|
|   |
| 104329924078_572460007265 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
However, theres a recent twist to this - the struct page in the scatter
list may not refer to the page being transferred - annoyingly, offset |
|
|   |
| 119827854539_528160007012 | James Steward |
|
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:36 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
2) and so far only for the mtdblock interface.
Please excuse my ignorance, but isnt PCMCIA to Compact Flash a
candidate? Its PIO isnt it?
|
|
|   |
| 176325204264_574860007145 | James Steward |
|
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 09:13 +1000, James Steward wrote:
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 06:46 +1000, James Steward wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 12:36 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
2) and so far |
|
|   |
| 118328304516_547660007432 | James Steward |
|
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:10:32AM +1000, James Steward wrote:
More fuel for the fire, I have a couple of shell scripts that run from
cron that suddenly threw me these 2 gems...
Pid: 1854, c |
|
|   |
| 109923204168_509060007570 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 09:45 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:10:32AM +1000, James Steward wrote:
More fuel for the fire, I have a couple of shell scripts that r |
|
|   |
| 141224624561_549060007702 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 08:53 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 02:05:15PM +1000, James Steward wrote:
Does this agree with your theory of a bad SoC?
Its differ |
|
|   |
| 175623844487_529460007789 | Guennadi Liakhovetsk |
|
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 14:42 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 12:07:04PM +1000, James Steward wrote:
Well that was an interesting test...
Ive attached the first |
|
|   |
| 130724284308_557260007134 | James Steward |
|
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:17AM +1000, James Steward wrote:
Ive now hacked in a linear feedback shift register as you suggested and
in doing that has made the ramtest more explosive on the sys |
|
|   |
| 171723584965_523360007347 | James Steward |
|
|
|
|   |
| 166629344668_583460007086 | James Steward |
|
|
|
|   |
| 140324364549_596560007735 | Peter Pearse |
|
"Jason Chang" <jchang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
This is technical referece manual doc.
I mean the programming source or sample code.
There might be some examples or some test programs |
|
|   |
| 166726824118_515360007784 | Message not availabl |
|
Hi all,
FYI, the attached patch (to the debian sarge gcc-3.3 package) stops
binaries generated by gcj-3.3 from segfaulting at startup on 2.6 arm
kernels. The underlying issue is one in libgc that h |
|
|   |
| 194222834211_525060007386 | jack chen |
|
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 07:35:38AM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
Since gcc 3.3 is no longer maintained, and debian sid doesnt ship
gcj-3.3 anymore, its not much use submitting bugs with either th |
|
|   |
| 138525724745_534960007579 | Peter Menzebach |
|
Peter wrote:
jack chen wrote:
Hi all :
How can i change a ramdisk that have been processed by U-boot tools "mkimage" ?
It seems that if d |
|
|   |
| 169624704513_536360007537 | Alan Casey |
|
Hi ALL:
I always set the parameter with following line :
setenv bootargs root=/dev/ram rw initrd=0x21100000,6000000 ramdisk_size=15360 ...
I know what they mean EXCEPT the |
|
|   |
| 145027084974_600060007900 | Bennett SH Wai |
|
Hi,
I want to know how process scheduling would happen in arm based system
running linux 2.4.21 kernel, specific to this example of mine.
Consider there is a processes which in a loop does only sta |
|
|   |
| 173423394582_585360007558 | x412x438x442x430x43B |
|
Le Vendredi 28 Octobre 2005 08:58, Bennett SH Wai a écrit :
I find AT91.com has changed that no Linux info is given now.
Does anyone know if 2.6.?? available for AT91RM9200? From where |
|
|   |
| 163624344842_584860007697 | Sushant Kumar Mishra |
|
|
|
|   |
| 123420694268_597960007073 | jinzhcheng |
|
hi,
I am trying to use use 2.6.13.4 kernel version for my
at91rm9200dk board.In that i have no support for
ethernet RMII.
The MII vs RMII selection is done via the is_rmii field of the
at91_e |
|
|   |
| 155721144543_506960007847 | Project TraineesEmbe |
|
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:25:32PM +0000, jinzhcheng wrote:
Please read rel="nofollow" www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php#e2 www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php#e2
|
|
|   |
| 160729294555_558060007226 | Pramod P K |
|
Hello!
I want to porting Intel VFM fs to my arm board(running linux-2.4.20),
maybe somebody has do it?
在 2005-10-27四的 19:04 +0800,linux-arm-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
|   |
| 148026614566_506160007057 | Sushant Kumar Mishra |
|
It seems the latest version of strace is not working
properly with 2.6.14. Below is a patch that fixes the
problem.
rel="nofollow" www.fluff.org/ben/patches/strace/strace-fix-arm-bad-syscall.p |
|
|   |
| 162021504492_546260007176 | Sushant Kumar Mishra |
|
|
|
|   |
| 115822314245_542760007664 | Michael Opdenacker |
|
arm-linux-gcc 2.95.3 is too old. There are major changes, so its better to
get the latest toolchain.
|
|
|   |
| 150027674779_504260007256 | Sushant Kumar Mishra |
|
Does the micro have a MMU or not?
Hi,
I want the 3.3.2 cross tool chain for arm.
From where i can download them.
regards
skm
________________________________________________ |
|
|   |
| 189024434184_544460007111 | Mathieu Deschamps |
|
Hi,
Im trying to mount USB pendrive as described at
rel="nofollow" oskfordummies.hp.infoseek.co.jp/howto/usbflash.html oskfordummies.hp.infoseek.co.jp/howto/usbflash.html
but my linux HA |
|
|   |
| 167125034773_523660007287 | Pramod P K |
|
|
|
|   |
| 129421844437_578660007435 | Aras Vaichas |
|
|
|
|   |
| 196328054666_520760007876 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
|
|
|   |
| 187127324642_564960007478 | Rodger Wilson |
|
I looked at online document and found there are low-latency patch and preemption patch for 2.4 kernel. Does anyone know if these patch are already part of 2.6.13 kernel? Does anyone actually try to m |
|
|   |
| 190626644921_509060007944 | Geoff Levand |
|
Rodger,
There was a brief discussion in Oprofile mail list regarding cross-compile
that might help you.
rel="nofollow" marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=oprofile-list&m=112967045229538&w=2 mar |
|
|   |
| 120227804446_597560007010 | Russell King ARM Li |
|
Hi All,
I am trying to figure where in the system.(arm based board, no swap etc, all
in memory, applications jffs2 based mounted partitions)
Its happening only when I am running in a specific mode a |
|
|   |